“Trust in Yhwh / and do good; - dwell / in the land / and
find / safe pasture / and take delight / in Yhwh – and he will / give you /
your heart’s desires.” The first two verses focused on what is to be avoided
(fretting and envy) due to the chasm that has opened up by the wicked/evil
person’s success. Stated negatively, this was to be avoided because these men
will “wither quickly” and “die away”. In other words, the ‘teacher’ is
imploring his student to ignore these men because their time is short. As we will see, this focus on time is a
central feature of the psalm. Here, the teacher moves into the positive
exhortations: trust…do good…dwell in the land…find safe pasture…take delight…heart’s
desires. If the previous verse was asking the student to ‘turn away’ from the evil
men, this verse is presenting him with an object to turn toward. And, the
teacher is supplying the reversal of verses 1-2: “do not envy those who do
wrong” – “trust in Yhwh and do good”; “like grass they will wither quickly” – “dwell
in the land and find safe pasture”; “do not fret/envy” – “take delight in Yhwh”.
There is one thing in particular I want
to focus on in this regard: Yhwh as the source of all good things.
Yhwh as source: the first two verses, if read
alone, have the potential of being interpreted in a manner that is very
inconsistent with the rest of the psalm. It could be read to say not to focus
on the wicked nor desire what they have. If read this way the verses would be
encouraging a form of detachment from the ‘goods’ the evil possess (including
wealth, honor, prestige, family, etc…). However, that does not seem to be the
point. Rather, the goods the evil have are goods. The problem is not what they
have but that they have them at all. However, there is something to that
reading that is partially true. Verses 3-4 encourage the student to, during
this ‘hiatus’, “trust in Yhwh” and through such trust his “heart’s desires”
will be given to him. In other words, trust in Yhwh that he will close the gap
and provide for you the things the evil men now have. Within this time of
patience, though, the student must come to see that the stability that comes
with the goods (the fact that they will not, as with the wicked man, be taken
away quickly) only comes if one “trusts in Yhwh” and “takes delight in Yhwh”. If
the goods are focused on, in and of themselves, ‘fretting’ and ‘envy’ emerge
because these goods can and do come into evil men’s possession. The point is
not simply to possess them, but to possess them with security and perpetually. It is these further qualities of the
goods (security and perpetuity) that only comes from Yhwh. This is where that
truth of detachment emerges but in a very modified way: goods are not grounded
in themselves but only when they are given by Yhwh. Detachment, in our sense,
recognizes that goods are ‘good’ only when they can be securely enjoyed and
passed on (as we will see later, the righteous are able to pass these on as “an
inheritance”). Understood from this vantage point, it seems very telling that
many prophecies (from the OT up to Revelation) envision wealth flowing to the
righteous only eschatologically (i.e., once ‘everything is subjected to the
father’; once ‘haven descends to earth” upon Christ’s return). It is only then
that ‘goods’ will find their fulfillment in time (in perpetuity and security).
No comments:
Post a Comment